[bug report] 'ASoC: Intel: haswell: Power transition refactor' and PulseAudio
Pierre-Louis Bossart
pierre-louis.bossart at linux.intel.com
Tue Sep 1 15:38:35 CEST 2020
On 9/1/20 6:33 AM, Cezary Rojewski wrote:
> On 2020-08-31 11:55 PM, Christian Bundy wrote:
>> After upgrading to Linux 5.8 I discovered an audio issue on my device
>> that was introduced in 8ec7d6043263ecf250b9b7c0dd8ade899487538a [0]. I
>> used 'git bisect' to identify the commit that introduced the bug and
>> have confirmed that reverting the commit resolves the problem
>>
>> Reproduction:
>>
>> 1. Play any audio via PulseAudio.
>> 2. Observe that the audio output is fuzzy and choppy.
>>
>> I can use programs like mpv to play audio without PulseAudio, and the
>> audio is fine, but as soon as I open a process that uses PulseAudio it
>> will ruin the audio output for all processes (including mpv) until I
>> reboot.
>>
>> I'm using a 2015 Chromebook Pixel ("Samus") and have confirmed this
>> problem with a friend who has the same device.
>>
>> Is there anything I can do to help debug this instead of sending a
>> patch to revert the commit?
>>
>
> Hello Christian,
>
> Thank you for report! Issue is a known one to us and has already been
> addressed by:
>
> [PATCH v4 00/13] ASoC: Intel: Catpt - Lynx and Wildcat point
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/alsa-devel/msg113762.html
>
> waiting for final dependency to be merged (Andy's resource-API changes,
> as Mark already added the SPI ones) so v5 with review changes can be
> provided. Shouldn't be long before this gets merged. As consequence,
> /haswell/ ceases to exist.
That leaves people with no working sound for 5.8 and 5.9.
> Basically, once power-cycle (D0 -> D3 -> D0 transition flow) had been
> fixed, more - previously hidden - problems arisen. Instead of sending
> 70+ patches to Mark refactoring existing code to recommended flow (+
> readability and performance improvements), replacement is provided along
> with old code being removed entirely.
>
> For now, if there's a possibility for you to modify your kernel, said
> patch can be safely removed from your local repo. Note: following is the
> outcome:
> - DMA init may occasionally fail on early boot (audio card won't be
> present at all, requires reboot)
> - D0/D3 flow doesn't follow recommended sequence and thus power-saving
> may be limited or non-existent
> Probably still better than permanently fuzzied audio..
Doesn't this mean that a revert is needed and applied to -stable for 5.8
and 5.9?
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list