disabling CONFIG_LED_CLASS (SND_HDA_CODEC_REALTEK)
Pavel Machek
pavel at ucw.cz
Wed Oct 14 10:11:17 CEST 2020
On Wed 2020-10-14 10:05:42, Udo van den Heuvel wrote:
> On 14-10-2020 09:58, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Contrary to his claims, Udo very probably has LEDs in his systems...
>
> We have a visible power LED.
> WE have a HDD LED.
> The board has LEDs, yes, but the SilverStone Fortress FT02 hides them
> fairly well.
> I did not ask for LEDs nor need them this way.
> It's a computer, not a disco-light or anything like that.
And you probably have numlock LED.
> Whether the code is big or not does not matter, it is a matter of being
> able to select what one needs without getting bothered with other code
> that will do nothing.
No.
Additional config options have costs, too, and we don't want to
support gazillion config options. LED core should be small enough that
it does not matter. Sound was inventing its own "tiny LED core"
before.
> So please consider.
I did. Answer is no. Please accept it.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/attachments/20201014/eb9cebee/attachment.sig>
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list