[PATCH 0/6] Ancillary bus implementation and SOF multi-client support

[Mark Brown]

On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 11:20:39AM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:

> I have nothing against MFD, but if this boils down to platform devices we
> are back to the initial open "are platform devices suitable as children of
> PCI devices"? I've heard Greg say no for the last year and a half - and he
> just re-stated this earlier in this thread.

As you'll have seen from this thread and the prior version (which was
the first time I became aware of this stuff) I'm not clear how that
desire maps on to hardware, as soon as subdevices start needing to get
regions and interrupts mapped then we're going to end up reinventing
resources and regmaps AFAICT.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/attachments/20201001/377b4c59/attachment.sig>