[PATCH 00/14] ASoC: Intel/SOF: extend run-time driver selection to ACPI devices

[Rojewski, Cezary]

On 2020-11-18 9:25 PM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:

...

>>
>> Hmm, then maybe I misunderstood Hans. Given his feedback it seemed like
>> Fedora is about to switch to SOF right now.
>>
>> Indeed, before I've sent patches removing Baytrail, basically every
>> support-team had been asked about its usage and the answers were
>> negative. /atom/ was covering basically every case anyway like you
>> pointed out so /baytrail/ solution felt more like a duplication.
>>
>> As SOF is the desired solution for atom-based products, I can see the
>> need for some sort of selection mechanism. The same cannot be said for
>> hsw/bdw though. Let's leave catpt out this, shall we?
> 
> It helps everyone to have a single build, e.g. 'make allmodconfig' or 
> 'make allyesconfig' would select all possible drivers and bots can run 
> wild.
> 

Why should bots care about not recommended code?
I'm against adding external dependency (intel-dsp-config) for
catpt for reasons I'd mentioned several times already.

Czarek