Applied "ASoC: soc-pcm: move dpcm_fe_dai_close()" to the asoc tree

[Mark Brown]

The patch

   ASoC: soc-pcm: move dpcm_fe_dai_close()

has been applied to the asoc tree at

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git 

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

>From 30fca26f8e2277ccd14fe3277a330b4f21cadca7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx at renesas.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 10:09:44 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: soc-pcm: move dpcm_fe_dai_close()

move dpcm_fe_dai_close() next to dpcm_fe_dai_open().
This is prepare for dpcm_fe_dai_open() cleanup

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx at renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart at linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan at linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87pndqp9uv.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org>
---
 sound/soc/soc-pcm.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
index e3a2c4f7757b..3686dda097e2 100644
--- a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
@@ -2978,6 +2978,26 @@ int soc_dpcm_runtime_update(struct snd_soc_card *card)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static int dpcm_fe_dai_close(struct snd_pcm_substream *fe_substream)
+{
+	struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe = fe_substream->private_data;
+	struct snd_soc_dpcm *dpcm;
+	int stream = fe_substream->stream, ret;
+
+	mutex_lock_nested(&fe->card->mutex, SND_SOC_CARD_CLASS_RUNTIME);
+	ret = dpcm_fe_dai_shutdown(fe_substream);
+
+	/* mark FE's links ready to prune */
+	for_each_dpcm_be(fe, stream, dpcm)
+		dpcm->state = SND_SOC_DPCM_LINK_STATE_FREE;
+
+	dpcm_be_disconnect(fe, stream);
+
+	fe->dpcm[stream].runtime = NULL;
+	mutex_unlock(&fe->card->mutex);
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static int dpcm_fe_dai_open(struct snd_pcm_substream *fe_substream)
 {
 	struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe = fe_substream->private_data;
@@ -3017,26 +3037,6 @@ static int dpcm_fe_dai_open(struct snd_pcm_substream *fe_substream)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int dpcm_fe_dai_close(struct snd_pcm_substream *fe_substream)
-{
-	struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe = fe_substream->private_data;
-	struct snd_soc_dpcm *dpcm;
-	int stream = fe_substream->stream, ret;
-
-	mutex_lock_nested(&fe->card->mutex, SND_SOC_CARD_CLASS_RUNTIME);
-	ret = dpcm_fe_dai_shutdown(fe_substream);
-
-	/* mark FE's links ready to prune */
-	for_each_dpcm_be(fe, stream, dpcm)
-		dpcm->state = SND_SOC_DPCM_LINK_STATE_FREE;
-
-	dpcm_be_disconnect(fe, stream);
-
-	fe->dpcm[stream].runtime = NULL;
-	mutex_unlock(&fe->card->mutex);
-	return ret;
-}
-
 /* create a new pcm */
 int soc_new_pcm(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd, int num)
 {
-- 
2.20.1