[PATCH] Add duplex sound support for USB devices using implicit feedback
Alexander Tsoy
alexander at tsoy.me
Mon Jun 1 18:37:38 CEST 2020
В Вс, 24/05/2020 в 10:37 +0200, Takashi Iwai пишет:
> On Sat, 23 May 2020 20:09:31 +0200,
> Erwin Burema wrote:
> > On zaterdag 23 mei 2020 19:53:49 CEST Alexander Tsoy wrote:
> > > В Вс, 10/05/2020 в 20:29 +0200, Erwin Burema пишет:
> > > > For USB sound devices using implicit feedback the endpoint used
> > > > for
> > > > this feedback should be able to be opened twice, once for
> > > > required
> > > > feedback and second time for audio data. This way these devices
> > > > can
> > > > be put in duplex audio mode. Since this only works if the
> > > > settings of
> > > > the endpoint don't change a check is included for this.
> > > >
> > > > This fixes bug 207023 ("MOTU M2 regression on duplex audio")
> > > > and
> > > > should also fix bug 103751 ("M-Audio Fast Track Ultra usb audio
> > > > device will not operate full-duplex")
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Erwin Burema <e.burema at gmail.com>
> > > > ---
> > >
> > > This patch seems to cause kernel panic on my system. This happens
> > > during boot when gdm (with pulseaudio) is starting up.
> > >
> >
> > That's interesting, not running gnome (and thus also not running
> > gdm,
> > currently KDE with SDDM) here so would need to take some time
> > troubleshooting.
> > Suspect I missed something in the check if both input and output
> > are similarly
> > configured.
> >
> > Will see if I can reproduce it and where exactly it goes wrong, in
> > the
> > meantime would it be possible to test if 5.6 or later show the same
> > issue
> > since I intially developed the patch against that release?
>
> Judging from the point triggering the bug (memset()), this can be a
> leftover URB handling that is performed even after the capture stream
> is closed. If so, the procedure would be:
> - start capture
> - start playback
> - stop capture while keeping playback running
>
> If my guess is correct, can the patch below work around the issue?
Unfortunately, I can no longer reproduce kernel panic, so can't really
test this patch. That's interesting, because it was 100% reproducible
on my hw a week ago.
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list