[alsa-devel] Question about snd_pcm_limit_hw_rates() call timing

[Kuninori Morimoto]

Hi Takashi-san

> Actually as Lars pointed out in another reply, the current code of
> soc_pcm_init_runtime_hw() is correct.  It's a bit tricky but smartly
> handling the cases: when rate_min/max are to be overridden by rates
> bits, they are supposed to be zero, and min_not_zero() does the
> trick.  Also, snd_pcm_rate_mask_intersect() sanitizes the bits when
> CONTINUOUS or KNOT is set, so the spurious rate bits won't be
> reflected in snd_pcm_limit_hw_rates(), too.
> 
> But still the dpcm_fe_dai_startup() needs to be fixed as you
> mentioned.  Though, I guess we need to fix not there but rather other
> places (e.g. dpcm_set_fe_runtime() itself).

Ahh, Yes of course.
Fixup dpcm_set_fe_runtime() is included in my previous
"We need to fixup dpcm_fe_dai_startup()" :)

Thank you for your help !!
Best regards
---
Kuninori Morimoto