non-existent SND_SOC_AC97_BUS_NEW (was: Re: [PATCH v9] ASoC: pxa: switch to new ac97 bus support)
Geert Uytterhoeven
geert at linux-m68k.org
Mon Feb 24 12:14:39 CET 2020
Hi Robert,
On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 10:12 PM Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik at free.fr> wrote:
> Switch to the new ac97 bus support in sound/ac97 instead of the legacy
> snd_ac97 one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik at free.fr>
This is commit 1c8bc7b3de5e76cb ("ASoC: pxa: switch to new ac97 bus
support") in v4.20-rc1 and later.
> --- a/sound/soc/pxa/Kconfig
> +++ b/sound/soc/pxa/Kconfig
> @@ -20,13 +20,12 @@ config SND_MMP_SOC
>
> config SND_PXA2XX_AC97
> tristate
> - select SND_AC97_CODEC
>
> config SND_PXA2XX_SOC_AC97
> tristate
> - select AC97_BUS
> + select AC97_BUS_NEW
> select SND_PXA2XX_LIB_AC97
> - select SND_SOC_AC97_BUS
> + select SND_SOC_AC97_BUS_NEW
The actual SND_SOC_AC97_BUS_NEW symbol never made it upstream, although
4 of its users did (3 have been removed in commit ea00d95200d02ece
("ASoC: Use imply for SND_SOC_ALL_CODECS")).
The definition seems to have been dropped silently in v4 of the series.
What should the select be replaced with? Or should it just be dropped?
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert at linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list