linux-next: Tree for Feb 18 (sound/soc/codecs/wm5110.c)

[Mark Brown]

On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 10:09:59AM +0000, Charles Keepax wrote:

> 1) We could update the machine drivers to do an imply as well,
> like the changes to SND_SOC_ALL_CODECS. I think this will
> generally work but doesn't really feel right as you can end up with
> the machine driver built without the CODEC.

Yes, that's not helpful.

> 2) We could update the machine drivers to a depends on and make
> the CODEC symbols manually selectable. I guess this also has the
> advantages that it would be necessary for the simple card stuff
> that seems to be everyones first choice for machine drivers these
> days.

That's not good, it means people have to know exactly what CODECs and
DAIs are on their board to even see the config option.

> Mark do you have any strong feelings on this I am leaning towards
> 2?

Why not just continue adding the relevant dependencies to the machine
drivers like we've always done?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/attachments/20200218/3a1e05ef/attachment.sig>