[resend/standalone PATCH v4] Add auxiliary bus support
Lee Jones
lee.jones at linaro.org
Fri Dec 18 14:46:03 CET 2020
On Fri, 18 Dec 2020, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 08:10:51AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 10:19:37PM +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>
> > > There is something I don't get from the documentation and it is what is
> > > this introducing that couldn't already be done using platform drivers
> > > and platform devices?
>
> > Because platform drivers and devices should ONLY be for actual platform
> > devices. Do NOT use that interface to fake up a non-platform device
> > (i.e. something that is NOT connected to a cpu through a memory-mapped
> > or direct-firmware interface).
>
> > Do not abuse the platform code anymore than it currently is, it's bad
> > enough what has been done to it over time, let's not make it any worse.
>
> I am not clear on why you're giving direct-firmware devices (which I
> assume means things like ARM SCMI where we're talking directly to some
> firmware?) a pass here but not for example a GPIO controlled devices.
> If this is mainly about improving abstractions it seems like the
> boundary here isn't great. Or perhaps I'm just missing what
> direct-firmware is supposed to mean?
>
> In any case, to be clear part of what you're saying here is that all
> I2C and SPI MFDs should be rewritten to use this new bus - I've just
> copied Lee in again since he keeps getting missed from these threads.
> As previously discussed this will need the auxilliary bus extending to
> support at least interrupts and possibly also general resources.
Thanks Mark.
Not entirely sure why this needed an entirely new subsystem to handle
non-MMIO Multi-Functional Devices (MFD). Or why I was not approached
by any of the developers during the process.
Having 2 entirely separate subsystems where MFDs can now be registered
sounds confusing and convoluted at best. Why not simply extend actual
MFD to be capable of registering non-pure platform devices via other
means? By doing so you keep things bound to a central location
resulting in less chance of misuse.
I turn away MFD implementation abuses all the time. Seeing as the 2
subsystems are totally disjoint, this just unwittingly opened up
another back-channel opportunity for those abuses to make it into the
mainline kernel.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list