[PATCH 0/4] ASoC:: don't use snd_soc_rtdcom_lookup()

[Mark Brown]

On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 03:39:58PM -0700, Ranjani Sridharan wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-04-23 at 07:12 +0900, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:

> > I'm thinking removing lookup function is nice idea,
> > but don't feel pressure to it.
> > "Now you know it" is very enough for me.

> I am having a hard time visualizing a scenario where we would have more
> than one platform component. And even if we did, I'd think that the
> driver registering these components would make sure to not duplicate
> the driver names. Of course, we dont really check if thats really the
> case. 

The only use case I can think of is a link where there's a CPU on both
ends for some reason.

> Do you think it makes sense to add that check when registering a
> component? If we do that, then keeping snd_soc_rtdcom_lookup() might
> not be such a bad idea. 

Yeah.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/attachments/20200423/09b6c6f0/attachment.sig>