[RFC v2] ALSA: control: fix a error handling exist in snd_ctl_elem_add
yangerkun
yangerkun at huawei.com
Tue Apr 14 11:03:21 CEST 2020
On 2020/4/14 14:54, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 08:51:09 +0200,
> yangerkun wrote:
>>
>> CVE-2020-11725 report that 'count = info->owner' may result a
>> SIZE_OVERFLOW. 'info->owner' represent a pid, and actually, we should
>> use info->count.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: yangerkun <yangerkun at huawei.com>
>
> The CVE report is simply wrong. info->owner is used intentionally for
> this specific API to add a user-space control. For the normal kernel
> kctls, the field is used indeed for storing the pid, but but the
> user-space kctl addition API usage is an exception.
>
> You can see the another use of info->count of field in the very same
> function at a later point and find it has a different meaning.
>
> The CVE should be disputed.
Got it! Thanks for your reply.
>
>
> thanks,
>
> Takashi
>
>> ---
>> sound/core/control.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> v1->v2: reword the patch head
>>
>> diff --git a/sound/core/control.c b/sound/core/control.c
>> index aa0c0cf182af..c77ca7f39637 100644
>> --- a/sound/core/control.c
>> +++ b/sound/core/control.c
>> @@ -1431,7 +1431,7 @@ static int snd_ctl_elem_add(struct snd_ctl_file *file,
>> return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> /* Check the number of elements for this userspace control. */
>> - count = info->owner;
>> + count = info->count;
>> if (count == 0)
>> count = 1;
>>
>> --
>> 2.21.1
>>
>
> .
>
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list