sw_params for a direct-ed(dmix) hw pcm

[Takashi Iwai]

On Wed, 01 Apr 2020 17:25:38 +0200,
sylvain.bertrand at gmail.com wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Lol, I was working on it too. I got almost exactly the same code related to the
> addition of a configuration variable:
>  - in 'struct snd_pcm_direct_open_conf' I used the type 'snd_pcm_tstamp_type_t'
>    instead of 'int' for the added tstamp_type field.
>  - idem for the 'struct snd_pcm_direct' tstamp_type field.

Heh, my initial patch was also with that strong type, but I changed it
because I wanted to allow the "system default" value, which isn't
represented with that type.


thanks,

Takashi