[alsa-devel] Applied "ASoC: soc-core: move soc_probe_dai() next to soc_remove_dai()" to the asoc tree

[Mark Brown]

The patch

   ASoC: soc-core: move soc_probe_dai() next to soc_remove_dai()

has been applied to the asoc tree at

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-5.4

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

>From a7d44f78063d642406132c2ed1dc6033d0d03cfe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx at renesas.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 09:15:06 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: soc-core: move soc_probe_dai() next to soc_remove_dai()

It is easy to read code if it is cleanly using paired function/naming,
like start <-> stop, register <-> unregister, etc, etc.
But, current ALSA SoC code is very random, unbalance, not paired, etc.
It is easy to create bug at the such code, and it will be difficult to
debug.

This patch moves soc_probe_dai() next to soc_remove_dai() which is
paired function.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx at renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87zhjkor1x.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org>
---
 sound/soc/soc-core.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-core.c b/sound/soc/soc-core.c
index 0a13f9461303..3ca5a21bfa6a 100644
--- a/sound/soc/soc-core.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-core.c
@@ -1106,6 +1106,26 @@ static void soc_remove_dai(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, int order)
 	dai->probed = 0;
 }
 
+static int soc_probe_dai(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, int order)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	if (dai->probed ||
+	    dai->driver->probe_order != order)
+		return 0;
+
+	ret = snd_soc_dai_probe(dai);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		dev_err(dai->dev, "ASoC: failed to probe DAI %s: %d\n",
+			dai->name, ret);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	dai->probed = 1;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static void soc_rtd_free(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd); /* remove me */
 static void soc_remove_link_dais(struct snd_soc_card *card)
 {
@@ -1411,26 +1431,6 @@ static int soc_rtd_init(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd, const char *name)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int soc_probe_dai(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, int order)
-{
-	int ret;
-
-	if (dai->probed ||
-	    dai->driver->probe_order != order)
-		return 0;
-
-	ret = snd_soc_dai_probe(dai);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		dev_err(dai->dev, "ASoC: failed to probe DAI %s: %d\n",
-			dai->name, ret);
-		return ret;
-	}
-
-	dai->probed = 1;
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
 static int soc_link_dai_pcm_new(struct snd_soc_dai **dais, int num_dais,
 				struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd)
 {
-- 
2.20.1