[alsa-devel] [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: fsl_asrc: Add support for imx8qm

[S.j. Wang]

Hi

> 
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 05:17:09PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> > There are two asrc module in imx8qm, each module has different clock
> > configuration, and the DMA type is EDMA.
> >
> > So in this patch, we define the new clocks, refine the clock map, and
> > include struct fsl_asrc_soc_data for different soc usage.
> >
> > The EDMA channel is fixed with each dma request, one dma request
> > corresponding to one dma channel. So we need to request dma channel
> > with dma request of asrc module.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang at nxp.com>
> > ---
> >  sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c     | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> >  sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.h     | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc_dma.c | 39 ++++++++++++----
> >  3 files changed, 167 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> 
> > diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc_dma.c
> > b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc_dma.c index d6146de9acd2..dbb07a486504
> 100644
> > --- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc_dma.c
> > +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc_dma.c
> > @@ -199,19 +199,40 @@ static int fsl_asrc_dma_hw_params(struct
> > snd_soc_component *component,
> >
> >       /* Get DMA request of Back-End */
> >       tmp_chan = dma_request_slave_channel(dev_be, tx ? "tx" : "rx");
> > -     tmp_data = tmp_chan->private;
> > -     pair->dma_data.dma_request = tmp_data->dma_request;
> > -     dma_release_channel(tmp_chan);
> > +     /* tmp_chan may be NULL for it is already allocated by Back-End */
> > +     if (tmp_chan) {
> > +             tmp_data = tmp_chan->private;
> > +             if (tmp_data)
> > +                     pair->dma_data.dma_request =
> > + tmp_data->dma_request;
> 
> If this patch is supposed to add a !tmp_chan case for EDMA, we probably
> shouldn't mute the !tmp_data case because dma_request will be NULL,
> although the code previously didn't have a check either. I mean we might
> need to error-out for !tmp_chan. Or...
> is this intentional?
> 

Yes, intentional. May be we can change to 

        if (!asrc_priv->soc->use_edma) {
                /* Get DMA request of Back-End */
                tmp_chan = dma_request_slave_channel(dev_be, tx ? "tx" : "rx");
                tmp_data = tmp_chan->private;
                pair->dma_data.dma_request = tmp_data->dma_request;
                dma_release_channel(tmp_chan);

                /* Get DMA request of Front-End */
                tmp_chan = fsl_asrc_get_dma_channel(pair, dir);
                tmp_data = tmp_chan->private;
                pair->dma_data.dma_request2 = tmp_data->dma_request;
                pair->dma_data.peripheral_type = tmp_data->peripheral_type;
                pair->dma_data.priority = tmp_data->priority;
                dma_release_channel(tmp_chan);
        }

Best regards
Wang shengjiu