[alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: SOF: imx: fix reverse CONFIG_SND_SOC_SOF_OF dependency
Pierre-Louis Bossart
pierre-louis.bossart at linux.intel.com
Tue Oct 1 18:03:45 CEST 2019
On 10/1/19 10:41 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 5:32 PM Pierre-Louis Bossart
> <pierre-louis.bossart at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> On 10/1/19 9:20 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> CONFIG_SND_SOC_SOF_IMX depends on CONFIG_SND_SOC_SOF, but is in
>>> turn referenced by the sof-of-dev driver. This creates a reverse
>>> dependency that manifests in a link error when CONFIG_SND_SOC_SOF_OF
>>> is built-in but CONFIG_SND_SOC_SOF_IMX=m:
>>>
>>> sound/soc/sof/sof-of-dev.o:(.data+0x118): undefined reference to `sof_imx8_ops'
>>>
>>> Make the latter a 'bool' symbol and change the Makefile so the imx8
>>> driver is compiled the same way as the driver using it.
>>>
>>> A nicer way would be to reverse the layering and move all
>>> the imx specific bits of sof-of-dev.c into the imx driver
>>> itself, which can then call into the common code. Doing this
>>> would need more testing and can be done if we add another
>>> driver like the first one.
>>
>> Or use something like
>>
>> config SND_SOC_SOF_IMX8_SUPPORT
>> bool "SOF support for i.MX8"
>> depends on IMX_SCU
>> depends on IMX_DSP
>>
>> config SND_SOC_SOF_IMX8
>> tristate
>> <i.mx selects>
>>
>> config SND_SOC_SOF_OF
>> depends on OF
>> select SND_SOC_SOF_IMX8 if SND_SOC_SOF_IMX8_SUPPORT
>>
>> That way you propagate the module/built-in information. That's how we
>> fixed those issues for the Intel parts.
>
> Yes, I think that would work here as well, but it keeps even more
> information about the specific drivers in the generic code. It also
> requires adding more 'select' statements that tend to cause more
> problems.
>
> The same could be done with a Kconfig-only solution avoiding
> 'select' such as:
>
> config SND_SOC_SOF_IMX8_SUPPORT
> bool "SOF support for i.MX8"
> depends on IMX_SCU
> depends on IMX_DSP
>
> config SND_SOC_SOF_IMX8
> def_tristate SND_SOC_SOF_OF
> depends on SND_SOC_SOF_IMX8_SUPPORT
Ah, nice, thanks for the suggestion! That would be my preference, we
have a similar select for PCI and ACPI parts in sound/soc/sof/Kconfig
and I was looking for a means to do this more elegantly.
I can submit a new fix or let you sent a v2, whatever is more convenient.
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list