[alsa-devel] [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: Intel - use control components to describe card config

[Mark Brown]

On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 09:37:15PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> Jaroslav Kysela wrote:

> > It's not about the protocol. It's about to move this type of
> > information to another place. I can remove the ALSA version sentence
> > from the help, because it's just a hint. I would like to create ucm2
> > configurations based on this rather than the misused long card names.

> But why these are exclusive?  The current longname workaround makes
> the device appearing a bit messy, but does it conflict with the
> additional component string?

Yeah, it's not clear to me why it's a config option to enable this.  I
can see a config option to turn off the old display name if it's
particularly irritating to people but I can't see any reason not to
just provide the new stuff.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/attachments/20191119/799ba263/attachment.sig>