[alsa-devel] [PATCH v3 08/19] ASoC: soc-core: tidyup snd_soc_lookup_component()

Kuninori Morimoto kuninori.morimoto.gx at renesas.com
Tue Nov 5 07:46:35 CET 2019


From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx at renesas.com>

snd_soc_lookup_component() is using mix of continue and break
in the same loop. It is odd.
This patch cleanup it.

Reported-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart at linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx at renesas.com>
---
v2 -> v3
	- new patch

 sound/soc/soc-core.c | 23 ++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-core.c b/sound/soc/soc-core.c
index b71bddb..acbaed4 100644
--- a/sound/soc/soc-core.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-core.c
@@ -360,25 +360,22 @@ struct snd_soc_component *snd_soc_lookup_component(struct device *dev,
 						   const char *driver_name)
 {
 	struct snd_soc_component *component;
-	struct snd_soc_component *ret;
+	struct snd_soc_component *found_component;
 
-	ret = NULL;
+	found_component = NULL;
 	mutex_lock(&client_mutex);
 	for_each_component(component) {
-		if (dev != component->dev)
-			continue;
-
-		if (driver_name &&
-		    (driver_name != component->driver->name) &&
-		    (strcmp(component->driver->name, driver_name) != 0))
-			continue;
-
-		ret = component;
-		break;
+		if ((dev == component->dev) &&
+		    (!driver_name ||
+		     (driver_name == component->driver->name) ||
+		     (strcmp(component->driver->name, driver_name) == 0))) {
+			found_component = component;
+			break;
+		}
 	}
 	mutex_unlock(&client_mutex);
 
-	return ret;
+	return found_component;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_lookup_component);
 
-- 
2.7.4



More information about the Alsa-devel mailing list