[alsa-devel] [PATCH v3 08/19] ASoC: soc-core: tidyup snd_soc_lookup_component()
Kuninori Morimoto
kuninori.morimoto.gx at renesas.com
Tue Nov 5 07:46:35 CET 2019
From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx at renesas.com>
snd_soc_lookup_component() is using mix of continue and break
in the same loop. It is odd.
This patch cleanup it.
Reported-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart at linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx at renesas.com>
---
v2 -> v3
- new patch
sound/soc/soc-core.c | 23 ++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-core.c b/sound/soc/soc-core.c
index b71bddb..acbaed4 100644
--- a/sound/soc/soc-core.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-core.c
@@ -360,25 +360,22 @@ struct snd_soc_component *snd_soc_lookup_component(struct device *dev,
const char *driver_name)
{
struct snd_soc_component *component;
- struct snd_soc_component *ret;
+ struct snd_soc_component *found_component;
- ret = NULL;
+ found_component = NULL;
mutex_lock(&client_mutex);
for_each_component(component) {
- if (dev != component->dev)
- continue;
-
- if (driver_name &&
- (driver_name != component->driver->name) &&
- (strcmp(component->driver->name, driver_name) != 0))
- continue;
-
- ret = component;
- break;
+ if ((dev == component->dev) &&
+ (!driver_name ||
+ (driver_name == component->driver->name) ||
+ (strcmp(component->driver->name, driver_name) == 0))) {
+ found_component = component;
+ break;
+ }
}
mutex_unlock(&client_mutex);
- return ret;
+ return found_component;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_lookup_component);
--
2.7.4
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list