[alsa-devel] [RFC PATCH v2] ASoC: dpcm: prevent snd_soc_dpcm use after free
KaiChieh Chuang
kaichieh.chuang at mediatek.com
Wed Mar 6 16:09:42 CET 2019
On Wed, 2019-03-06 at 10:19 +0100, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
> Dne 06. 03. 19 v 9:46 KaiChieh Chuang napsal(a):
> > the dpcm get from fe_clients/be_clients
> > may be free before use
> >
> > @@ -1294,9 +1294,11 @@ void dpcm_be_disconnect(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, int stream)
> > #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
> > debugfs_remove(dpcm->debugfs_state);
> > #endif
> > + spin_lock(&fe->card->dpcm_lock);
> > list_del(&dpcm->list_be);
> > list_del(&dpcm->list_fe);
> > kfree(dpcm);
> > + spin_unlock(&fe->card->dpcm_lock);
>
> The unlock might be moved before kfree(). Also, I don't see the
> list_add() spin lock protection in your patch.
>
> Jaroslav
>
The dpcm_lock in this patch is to protect the instance of dpcm,
e.g. protect dpcm not to be free while dereference from the
be_clients/fe_clients.
The lock is not meant to protect the list "be_clients" and "fe_client",
e.g. not meant to protect add/remove dpcm from these list.
The lock is added only at the places that may have race with
dpcm_be_disconnect(), e.g. kfree(dpcm). And note that, many places that
call for_each_dpcm_be/fe() cannot use spin_lock, since there are pcm
callbacks which can sleep.
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list