[alsa-devel] Applied "ASoC: samsung: smdk_wm8994: consider CPU-Platform possibility" to the asoc tree

Mark Brown broonie at kernel.org
Fri Jun 28 18:56:25 CEST 2019


The patch

   ASoC: samsung: smdk_wm8994: consider CPU-Platform possibility

has been applied to the asoc tree at

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-5.3

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

>From 806bfc27ea84e7d934f513b6f4948138c782fb4a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx at renesas.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 10:48:19 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: samsung: smdk_wm8994: consider CPU-Platform possibility

commit d815e0f08fdd ("ASoC: samsung: smdk_wm8994: don't select unnecessary
Platform")

Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.

But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.

In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.

Fixes: commit d815e0f08fdd ("ASoC: samsung: smdk_wm8994: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx at renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org>
---
 sound/soc/samsung/smdk_wm8994.c | 9 +++++++--
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/samsung/smdk_wm8994.c b/sound/soc/samsung/smdk_wm8994.c
index 99aa1620a17d..28f8be000aa1 100644
--- a/sound/soc/samsung/smdk_wm8994.c
+++ b/sound/soc/samsung/smdk_wm8994.c
@@ -102,11 +102,13 @@ static int smdk_wm8994_init_paiftx(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd)
 
 SND_SOC_DAILINK_DEFS(aif1,
 	DAILINK_COMP_ARRAY(COMP_CPU("samsung-i2s.0")),
-	DAILINK_COMP_ARRAY(COMP_CODEC("wm8994-codec", "wm8994-aif1")));
+	DAILINK_COMP_ARRAY(COMP_CODEC("wm8994-codec", "wm8994-aif1")),
+	DAILINK_COMP_ARRAY(COMP_PLATFORM("samsung-i2s.0")));
 
 SND_SOC_DAILINK_DEFS(fifo_tx,
 	DAILINK_COMP_ARRAY(COMP_CPU("samsung-i2s-sec")),
-	DAILINK_COMP_ARRAY(COMP_CODEC("wm8994-codec", "wm8994-aif1")));
+	DAILINK_COMP_ARRAY(COMP_CODEC("wm8994-codec", "wm8994-aif1")),
+	DAILINK_COMP_ARRAY(COMP_PLATFORM("samsung-i2s-sec")));
 
 static struct snd_soc_dai_link smdk_dai[] = {
 	{ /* Primary DAI i/f */
@@ -163,6 +165,9 @@ static int smdk_audio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 			   "Property 'samsung,i2s-controller' missing or invalid\n");
 			ret = -EINVAL;
 		}
+
+		smdk_dai[0].platforms->name = NULL;
+		smdk_dai[0].platforms->of_node = smdk_dai[0].cpus->of_node;
 	}
 
 	id = of_match_device(of_match_ptr(samsung_wm8994_of_match), &pdev->dev);
-- 
2.20.1



More information about the Alsa-devel mailing list