[alsa-devel] [PATCH 5/5] ASoC: SOF: ipc: clarify operator precedence
Pierre-Louis Bossart
pierre-louis.bossart at linux.intel.com
Wed Jun 12 18:57:05 CEST 2019
Cppcheck complains about the following warning, fix by adding
parentheses
[sound/soc/sof/ipc.c:783]:
(style) Clarify calculation precedence for '&' and '?'.
[sound/soc/sof/ipc.c:785]:
(style) Clarify calculation precedence for '&' and '?'.
[sound/soc/sof/ipc.c:787]:
(style) Clarify calculation precedence for '&' and '?'.
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart at linux.intel.com>
---
sound/soc/sof/ipc.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/sof/ipc.c b/sound/soc/sof/ipc.c
index f3eb46bc808b..20dfca9c93b7 100644
--- a/sound/soc/sof/ipc.c
+++ b/sound/soc/sof/ipc.c
@@ -780,11 +780,11 @@ int snd_sof_ipc_valid(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev)
" lock debug: %s\n"
" lock vdebug: %s\n",
v->build, v->date, v->time,
- ready->flags & SOF_IPC_INFO_GDB ?
+ (ready->flags & SOF_IPC_INFO_GDB) ?
"enabled" : "disabled",
- ready->flags & SOF_IPC_INFO_LOCKS ?
+ (ready->flags & SOF_IPC_INFO_LOCKS) ?
"enabled" : "disabled",
- ready->flags & SOF_IPC_INFO_LOCKSV ?
+ (ready->flags & SOF_IPC_INFO_LOCKSV) ?
"enabled" : "disabled");
}
--
2.20.1
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list