[alsa-devel] [RFC PATCH 17/40] soundwire: bus: use runtime_pm_get_sync/pm when enabled
Andy Shevchenko
andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com
Fri Jul 26 21:08:23 CEST 2019
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 01:08:57PM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> This thread became unreadable with interleaved top-posting, allow me restate
> the options and ask PM folks what they think
>
> On 7/25/19 6:40 PM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> > Not all platforms support runtime_pm for now, let's use runtime_pm
> > only when enabled.
Just a side note below...
> > - ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(slave->bus->dev);
> > - if (ret < 0)
Here...
> > - return ret;
> > + if (pm_runtime_enabled(slave->bus->dev)) {
> > + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(slave->bus->dev);
> > + if (ret < 0)
...and thus here...
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > ret = sdw_transfer(slave->bus, &msg);
> > - pm_runtime_put(slave->bus->dev);
> > +
> > + if (pm_runtime_enabled(slave->bus->dev))
> > + pm_runtime_put(slave->bus->dev);
>
> This is option1: we explicitly test if pm_runtime is enabled before calling
> _get_sync() and _put()
>
> option2 (suggested by Jan Kotas): catch the -EACCESS error code
>
> ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(slave->bus->dev);
> - if (ret < 0)
> + if (ret < 0 && ret != -EACCES)
...and here, the pm_runtime_put_noidle() call is missed.
> return ret;
>
> option3: ignore the return value as done in quite a few drivers
>
> Are there any other options? I am personally surprised this is not handled
> in the pm_runtime core, not sure why users need to test for this?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list