[alsa-devel] DW-DMA: Probe failures on broadwell

Curtis Malainey cujomalainey at google.com
Tue Jul 9 21:27:49 CEST 2019


Hi Andy,

Thanks for the information, we are running a 4.14 kernel so we don't
have the idma32 driver, I will see if I can backport it and report
back if the fix works.

Thanks.

On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 6:38 AM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 04:34:48PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 04:29:43PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 04:14:01PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 01:50:07PM -0700, Curtis Malainey wrote:
> > >
> > > > So, the correct fix is to provide a platform data, like it's done in
> > > > drivers/dma/dw/pci.c::idma32_pdata, in the sst-firmware.c::dw_probe(), and call
> > > > idma32_dma_probe() with idma32_dma_remove() respectively on removal stage.
> > > >
> > > > (It will require latest patches to be applied, which are material for v5.x)
> > >
> > > Below completely untested patch to try
> >
> > Also, it might require to set proper request lines (currently it uses 0 AFAICS).
> > Something like it's done in drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx-pci.c for Intel Merrifield.
>
> And SST_DSP_DMA_MAX_BURST seems encoded while it's should be simple number,
> like 8 (bytes). Also SPI PXA is an example to look into.
>
> I doubt it has been validated with upstream driver (I know about some internal
> drivers, hacked version of dw one, you may find sources somewhere in public).
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>


More information about the Alsa-devel mailing list