[alsa-devel] ASoC: Intel: sst: Missing IRQ at index 5 on BYT-T device

[Antonio Ospite]

On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 21:56:10 +0100
Antonio Ospite <ao2 at ao2.it> wrote:

> On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 18:35:02 +0100
> Stephan Gerhold <stephan at gerhold.net> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 10:54:55AM -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> > > 
[...]
> > > Baytrail platforms are so different (BIOS and hardware) that I don't think
> > > we'll manage to pull this off without quirks.
> > > 
> > 
> > It definitely works on my device and the few others I have seen with 
> > only one IRQ listed. But there might be devices out there which are not 
> > covered by the pmic-type based detection but still have all 6 IRQs 
> > listed.
> > 
> > As for the "Teclast X98 Air 3G": Antonio, you mentioned that you have 
> > last tested mainline a few years back. Can you re-test without any 
> > modifications to the DSDT table on a recent mainline kernel?
> >
> 
> I'll try to boot a recent kernel with the original DSDT this Sunday, if
> I fail to find the time I should be able to do it on Dec 27th.
> 

JFTR I managed to boot a recent kernel on the "Teclast X98 Air 3G"
without overriding the DSDT, and audio works fine indeed.

The touchscreen does not (the IRQ number is wrong in DSDT), but that's
another story. :)

Thank you,
   Antonio

-- 
Antonio Ospite
https://ao2.it
https://twitter.com/ao2it

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
   See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?