[alsa-devel] [PATCH] ALSA: PCM: check if ops are defined before suspending PCM

Ranjani Sridharan ranjani.sridharan at linux.intel.com
Tue Feb 12 21:48:10 CET 2019


On Sat, 2019-02-09 at 10:27 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Sat, 09 Feb 2019 00:29:53 +0100,
> Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> > 
> > From: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan at linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > BE dai links only have internal PCM's and their substream ops may
> > not be set. Suspending these PCM's will result in their
> >  ops->trigger() being invoked and cause a kernel oops.
> > So skip suspending PCM's if their ops are NULL.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan at linux.intel.com
> > >
> > Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <
> > pierre-louis.bossart at linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  sound/core/pcm_native.c | 8 ++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/sound/core/pcm_native.c b/sound/core/pcm_native.c
> > index 818dff1de545..b6e158ce6650 100644
> > --- a/sound/core/pcm_native.c
> > +++ b/sound/core/pcm_native.c
> > @@ -1506,6 +1506,14 @@ int snd_pcm_suspend_all(struct snd_pcm *pcm)
> >  			/* FIXME: the open/close code should lock this
> > as well */
> >  			if (substream->runtime == NULL)
> >  				continue;
> > +
> > +			/*
> > +			 * Skip BE dai link PCM's that are internal and
> > may
> > +			 * not have their substream ops set.
> > +			 */
> > +			if (!substream->ops)
> > +				continue;
> > +
> >  			err = snd_pcm_suspend(substream);
> >  			if (err < 0 && err != -EBUSY)
> >  				return err;
> 
> Basically it's OK and safe to apply this check.  We may need to add
> such sanity checks in more places if this really hits.
> 
> But I still wonder how this can go through.  Is substream->runtime
> set
> even if substream->ops is NULL?  The substream->runtime is assigned
> dynamically at opening a substream via snd_pcm_attach_substream(), so
> without opening it, it must be NULL.
Hi Takashi,

My guess is that this happens during
dpcm_be_connect(fe, be, stream) in dpcm_add_paths().

The reason this wasnt exposed before was that the fe dai link pcm's
were suspended first. So when it was BE dai links' turn, the pcm was
already suspended. In the case of SOF, the order of dai links in the
rtd_list is BE dai links first and then the FE dai links.

Thanks,
Ranjani

> 
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Takashi
> _______________________________________________
> Alsa-devel mailing list
> Alsa-devel at alsa-project.org
> http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel



More information about the Alsa-devel mailing list