[alsa-devel] [RESEND PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings: soundwire: add slave bindings
Srinivas Kandagatla
srinivas.kandagatla at linaro.org
Tue Aug 27 22:28:56 CEST 2019
thanks for reviewing the patch!
On 27/08/2019 21:20, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 12:23:40PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
>> On 23-08-19, 00:37, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>>> This patch adds bindings for Soundwire Slave devices that includes how
>>> SoundWire enumeration address and Link ID are used to represented in
>>> SoundWire slave device tree nodes.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla at linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> .../soundwire/soundwire-controller.yaml | 75 +++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soundwire/soundwire-controller.yaml
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soundwire/soundwire-controller.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soundwire/soundwire-controller.yaml
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..91aa6c6d6266
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soundwire/soundwire-controller.yaml
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>> +%YAML 1.2
>>> +---
>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/soundwire/soundwire-controller.yaml#
>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>> +
>>> +title: SoundWire Controller Generic Binding
>>
>> Controller does not make sense here, why not use spec terminology and
>> say "SoundWire Slave Generic Binding"
>
> It's both IMO. It's describing the structure of child devices of a
> controller (aka a bus).
>
>>
>>> +
>>> +maintainers:
>>> + - Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla at linaro.org>
>>> +
>>> +description: |
>>> + SoundWire busses can be described with a node for the SoundWire controller
>>> + device and a set of child nodes for each SoundWire slave on the bus.
>>> +
>>> +properties:
>>> + $nodename:
>>> + pattern: "^soundwire(@.*|-[0-9a-f])*$"
>
> '-[0-9a-f]' was to handle cases like spi-gpio or i2c-gpio. Would a
> bit banged interface be possible here?
Highly unlikely!
>
>>> +
>>> + "#address-cells":
>>> + const: 2
>>> +
>>> + "#size-cells":
>>> + const: 0
>>> +
>>> +patternProperties:
>>> + "^.*@[0-9a-f]+$":
>
> If there are distinct fields in the address, they are typically comma
> separated in the unit-address.
okay, will fix that in next version!
>
>>> + type: object
>>> +
>>> + properties:
>>> + compatible:
>>> + pattern: "^sdw[0-9][0-9a-f]{4}[0-9a-f]{4}[0-9a-f]{2}$"
>>> + description:
>>> + Is the textual representation of SoundWire Enumeration
>>> + address. compatible string should contain SoundWire Version ID,
>>> + Manufacturer ID, Part ID and Class ID in order and shall be in
>>> + lower-case hexadecimal with leading zeroes.
>>> + Valid sizes of these fields are
>>> + Version ID is 1 nibble, number '0x1' represents SoundWire 1.0
>>> + and '0x2' represents SoundWire 1.1 and so on.
>>> + MFD is 4 nibbles
>>> + PID is 4 nibbles
>>> + CID is 2 nibbles
>>> + More Information on detail of encoding of these fields can be
>>> + found in MIPI Alliance DisCo & SoundWire 1.0 Specifications.
>>> +
>>> + reg:
>>> + maxItems: 1
>>> + description:
>>> + Instance ID and Link ID of SoundWire Device Address.
>>
>> This looks better :) Thanks.
>>
>> Apart from the minor nit above this looks good to me, I can merge the
>> sdw parts if Rob is fine with them.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>> +
>>> + required:
>>> + - compatible
>>> + - reg
>>> +
>>> +examples:
>>> + - |
>>> + soundwire at c2d0000 {
>>> + #address-cells = <2>;
>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>> + compatible = "qcom,soundwire-v1.5.0";
>
> This will probably change once I review it. :)
:-)
thanks,
srini
>
>>> + reg = <0x0c2d0000 0x2000>;
>>> +
>>> + speaker at 1 {
>>> + compatible = "sdw10217201000";
>>> + reg = <1 0>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + speaker at 2 {
>>> + compatible = "sdw10217201000";
>>> + reg = <2 0>;
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> +...
>>> --
>>> 2.21.0
>>
>> --
>> ~Vinod
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list