[alsa-devel] [PATCH -next] ASoC: sun4i-i2s: Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO in sun4i_i2s_init_regmap_fields()

[Mark Brown]

On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 10:34:37PM +0800, Yuehaibing wrote:
> On 2019/8/22 22:18, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 06:52:52AM +0000, YueHaibing wrote:

> >> -	if (IS_ERR(i2s->field_fmt_sr))
> >> -		return PTR_ERR(i2s->field_fmt_sr);
> >> -
> >> -	return 0;
> >> +	return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(i2s->field_fmt_sr);

> > I'm not really convinced that this more readable or more maintainable
> > though. Is there a reason for this other than we can do it?

> No special reason, just suggested by scripts/coccinelle/api/ptr_ret.cocci

Which is a bit of a reason in itself since it'll save other people
looking at the same thing though with a return like this I have to agree
with Maxime a bit and question if the coccinelle script is really a good
idea.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/attachments/20190822/46d19ccb/attachment-0001.sig>