[alsa-devel] [PATCH 08/28] ASoC: soc-core: don't check controls for snd_soc_add_component_controls()
Ranjani Sridharan
ranjani.sridharan at linux.intel.com
Tue Aug 6 06:38:34 CEST 2019
On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 10:28 +0900, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx at renesas.com>
>
> snd_soc_add_component_controls() registers controls by using
> for(... i < num; ...). If controls was NULL, num should be zero.
> Thus, we don't need to check about controls pointer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx at renesas.com>
> ---
> sound/soc/soc-core.c | 7 +++----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-core.c b/sound/soc/soc-core.c
> index bdd6a2e..7be8385 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/soc-core.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/soc-core.c
> @@ -1304,10 +1304,9 @@ static int soc_probe_component(struct
> snd_soc_card *card,
> }
> }
>
> - if (component->driver->controls)
> - snd_soc_add_component_controls(component,
> - component->driver-
> >controls,
> - component->driver-
> >num_controls);
> + snd_soc_add_component_controls(component,
> + component->driver->controls,
> + component->driver-
> >num_controls);
Should the return value be checked?
Thanks,
Ranjani
> if (component->driver->dapm_routes)
> snd_soc_dapm_add_routes(dapm,
> component->driver->dapm_routes,
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list