[alsa-devel] [PATCH 19/19] ASoC: Intel: bytcr_rt5640: Set card long_name based on quirks
Hans de Goede
hdegoede at redhat.com
Thu May 10 12:27:33 CEST 2018
Hi,
On 08-05-18 20:35, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> On 5/8/18 10:36 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Many X86 devices using a BYT SoC + RT5640 codec are cheap devices with
>> generic DMI strings, causing snd_soc_set_dmi_name() to fail to set a
>> long_name, making it impossible for userspace to have a correct UCM
>> profile which only uses inputs / outputs which are actually hooked up
>> on the device.
>>
>> Our quirks already specify which input the internal mic is connected to
>> and if a single (mono) speaker is used or if the device has stereo
>> speakers.
>>
>> This commit sets a long_name based on the quirks so that userspace can
>> have UCM profiles doing the right thing based on the long_name.
>
> Isn't this going to be complicated to manage for UCM? Just with this patch alone, you'd need 8 UCM files to cover all the combinations. 16 if you add the 'sof-' prefix.
>
> seems like UCM should become more 'dynamic' and get quirk information somehow (sysfs?) to enable/disable endpoints rather than rely on name encoding to select the right profile?
I agree that this is not ideal, but this is an improvement from the
current state where we would need 1 UCM profile per board
(assuming valid DMI data and thus a proper long-name being set),
6 profiles (dmic2 is not used anywhere sofar) is a whole lot easier
to manage then 1 profile per board. So as said I believe this is
a step in the right direction.
And looking at the foreseeable future I simply don't see any of us
having the time to implement an ideal solution for this. I would
really like for end users to be able to run the latest upstream
kernel + alsa-lib and have things just work, before this hardware
becomes obsolete. I know that no-one having time to work on reworking
UCM to make it more dynamic is not the best of arguments but it
is something to take into consideration.
Thinking more about this on the alsa-lib / UCM profile side we
could have something like this:
/usr/share/alsa/ucm/bytcr-rt5640-mono-spk-in1-mic/bytcr-rt5640-mono-spk-in1-mic.conf:
SectionUseCase."HiFi" {
File "../bytcr-rt5640/Generic.conf"
File "../bytcr-rt5640/MonoSpeaker.conf"
File "../bytcr-rt5640/In1Mic.conf"
Comment "Play HiFi quality Music"
}
SectionDefaults [
cdev "hw:bytcrrt5640"
]
The only problem I can see with that is that the "ConflictingDevice"
sections for the various inputs / outputs then would refer to not
present SectionDevice sections. I have not tested this suggestion yet,
but I'm willing to write an alsa-lib patch to ignore non present
ConflictingDevice references, to make my suggestion work.
I think doing things this way, thus avoiding the need to copy and
paste a whole lot of UCM code for the 6 profiles it will not be
a problem to maintain 6 profiles, as we're really just maintaining
6 config snippets such as the above example and only one complete
profile.
Would the solution I outlined above be acceptable to you?
Regards,
Hans
>> Note that if we ever encounter the need for a special UCM profile for
>> some device we can add a quirk to set a specific long_name for the
>> device,
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com>
>> ---
>> sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcr_rt5640.c | 9 +++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcr_rt5640.c b/sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcr_rt5640.c
>> index cfc520200214..9a1204dcdbc6 100644
>> --- a/sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcr_rt5640.c
>> +++ b/sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcr_rt5640.c
>> @@ -929,6 +929,7 @@ static struct snd_soc_dai_link byt_rt5640_dais[] = {
>> static char byt_rt5640_codec_name[SND_ACPI_I2C_ID_LEN];
>> static char byt_rt5640_codec_aif_name[12]; /* = "rt5640-aif[1|2]" */
>> static char byt_rt5640_cpu_dai_name[10]; /* = "ssp[0|2]-port" */
>> +static char byt_rt5640_long_name[40]; /* = "bytcr-rt5640-*-spk-*-mic" */
>> static int byt_rt5640_suspend(struct snd_soc_card *card)
>> {
>> @@ -1000,6 +1001,7 @@ struct acpi_chan_package { /* ACPICA seems to require 64 bit integers */
>> static int snd_byt_rt5640_mc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> + const char * const map_name[] = { "dmic1", "dmic2", "in1", "in3" };
>> const struct dmi_system_id *dmi_id;
>> struct byt_rt5640_private *priv;
>> struct snd_soc_acpi_mach *mach;
>> @@ -1163,6 +1165,13 @@ static int snd_byt_rt5640_mc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> }
>> }
>> + snprintf(byt_rt5640_long_name, sizeof(byt_rt5640_long_name),
>> + "bytcr-rt5640-%s-spk-%s-mic",
>> + (byt_rt5640_quirk & BYT_RT5640_MONO_SPEAKER) ?
>> + "mono" : "stereo",
>> + map_name[BYT_RT5640_MAP(byt_rt5640_quirk)]);
>> + byt_rt5640_card.long_name = byt_rt5640_long_name;
>> +
>> ret_val = devm_snd_soc_register_card(&pdev->dev, &byt_rt5640_card);
>> if (ret_val) {
>>
>
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list