[alsa-devel] [PATCH 3/3] ASoC: Add Multi CPU DAI support in DAPM

Shreyas NC shreyas.nc at intel.com
Mon Mar 12 06:37:52 CET 2018


On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 10:01:24PM +0530, Charles Keepax wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 04:30:30PM +0530, Shreyas NC wrote:
> > Extend the multi CPU support in DAPM functions to check for
> > valid widgets and connected widgets.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Shreyas NC <shreyas.nc at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  sound/soc/soc-dapm.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> >  1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
> > index 2f34590..6c7b0f4 100644
> > --- a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
> > +++ b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
> > @@ -4066,38 +4066,57 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_link_dai_widgets(struct snd_soc_card *card)
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static void dapm_connect_dai_link_widgets(struct snd_soc_card *card,
> > -					  struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd)
> > +static void dapm_check_dai_valid_widget(struct snd_soc_card *card,
> > +					struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd,
> > +					struct snd_soc_dai *codec_dai,
> > +					struct snd_soc_dai *cpu_dai)
> 
> Not sure about the name here dapm_check_dai_valid_widget doesn't
> sound like it should be adding paths, otherwise I think this one
> looks ok.
> 

Ok, does dapm_add_valid_widget() sound better?

--Shreyas
-- 


More information about the Alsa-devel mailing list