[alsa-devel] [PATCH v7 09/10] soundwire: Add support for multi link bank switch
Pierre-Louis Bossart
pierre-louis.bossart at linux.intel.com
Thu Jul 26 16:02:03 CEST 2018
The series looks pretty good now, I just found one possible improvement
below
Thanks!
>
> -static int sdw_bank_switch(struct sdw_bus *bus)
> +static int sdw_bank_switch(struct sdw_bus *bus, int m_rt_count)
> {
> int col_index, row_index;
> + bool multi_link;
> struct sdw_msg *wr_msg;
> u8 *wbuf = NULL;
> int ret = 0;
> @@ -638,6 +639,8 @@ static int sdw_bank_switch(struct sdw_bus *bus)
> if (!wr_msg)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> + bus->defer_msg.msg = wr_msg;
> +
> wbuf = kzalloc(sizeof(*wbuf), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!wbuf) {
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> @@ -658,17 +661,29 @@ static int sdw_bank_switch(struct sdw_bus *bus)
> SDW_MSG_FLAG_WRITE, wbuf);
> wr_msg->ssp_sync = true;
>
> - ret = sdw_transfer(bus, wr_msg);
> + /*
> + * Set the multi_link flag only when both the hardware supports
> + * and there is a stream handled by multiple masters
> + */
> + multi_link = bus->multi_link && (m_rt_count > 1);
> +
> + if (multi_link)
> + ret = sdw_transfer_defer(bus, wr_msg, &bus->defer_msg);
> + else
> + ret = sdw_transfer(bus, wr_msg);
> +
> if (ret < 0) {
> dev_err(bus->dev, "Slave frame_ctrl reg write failed");
> goto error;
> }
>
> - kfree(wr_msg);
> - kfree(wbuf);
> - bus->defer_msg.msg = NULL;
> - bus->params.curr_bank = !bus->params.curr_bank;
> - bus->params.next_bank = !bus->params.next_bank;
> + if (!bus->multi_link) {
> + kfree(wr_msg);
> + kfree(wbuf);
> + bus->defer_msg.msg = NULL;
> + bus->params.curr_bank = !bus->params.curr_bank;
> + bus->params.next_bank = !bus->params.next_bank;
> + }
Should this test be extended to the case where the bus can support
multi-link but m_rt_count ==1
should it be
if (!multi_link)
?
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list