[alsa-devel] [PATCH v2] ASoC: hdac_hdmi: Program pin-port-mux during jack report event
Takashi Iwai
tiwai at suse.de
Wed Jul 11 12:03:14 CEST 2018
On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 11:25:46 +0200,
Sriram Periyasamy wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 08:45:05AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 08:30:43 +0200,
> > Sriram Periyasamy wrote:
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * Restore the connection selection index of the
> > > + * respective pin.
> > > + */
> > > + if (port->pin->conn_index > 0)
> > > + snd_hdac_codec_write(&edev->hdev, port->pin->nid,
> > > + 0, AC_VERB_SET_CONNECT_SEL,
> > > + port->pin->conn_index - 1);
> >
> > And, here checks conn_index > 0 while...
> >
> > > @@ -903,6 +931,9 @@ static int hdac_hdmi_set_pin_port_mux(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > + if (ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] > 0)
> > > + port->pin->conn_index = ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0];
> >
> > ... conn_index is set only non-zero here.
> >
> > That is, once after a non-zero is passed, conn_index can't any longer
> > back to zero. I guess it's not intentional?
> >
>
> No, it is intentional. For example, two ports are connected to the
> display and user land set mux only for one port. Hence other port's
> conn_index is set to default 0. When jack report happens for that port,
> we would be writing invalid connection select index which will lead to
> undefined hardware behaviour as per the HDA spec.
>
> Though it is userland's mistake, it is better to take care in the driver.
Then wouldn't it be better to remember the last set value in
hdac_hdmi_pin_mux_widget_event()? The purpose of the patch is to
restore the previous state.
thanks,
Takashi
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list