[alsa-devel] [asoc:topic/wm9705 1/1] sound/soc/codecs/wm9705.c:330:18: error: implicit declaration of function 'snd_soc_new_ac97_component'; did you mean 'snd_soc_new_ac97_codec'?

[Fengguang Wu]

Hi Mark,

On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 02:49:11PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 10:19:57PM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
>
>>    sound/soc/codecs/wm9705.c: In function 'wm9705_soc_probe':
>> >> sound/soc/codecs/wm9705.c:330:18: error: implicit declaration of function 'snd_soc_new_ac97_component'; did you mean 'snd_soc_new_ac97_codec'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>       wm9705->ac97 = snd_soc_new_ac97_component(component, WM9705_VENDOR_ID,
>>                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>                      snd_soc_new_ac97_codec
>
>I've dropped this and the other patch that had the same issue.
>I wonder why 0day didn't notice this on the list...

Sorry but all the robot can notice is when an error disappears
in the _same_ branch that introduced the error. It does not try to
understand comments in the mailing list. Internally, it associates
errors to git branches and commits. If a problematic patch is dropped
in branch A but still remains in branch B, we should probably still
report the issue in B? 

Thanks,
Fengguang