[alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: sigmadsp: safeload should be used from 4 bytes
Lars-Peter Clausen
lars at metafoo.de
Wed Aug 22 15:05:44 CEST 2018
On 08/22/2018 09:53 AM, Danny Smith wrote:
>
>
> On 08/22/2018 08:34 AM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>> On 08/22/2018 08:11 AM, Robert Rosengren wrote:
>>> From: Danny Smith <dannys at axis.com>
>>>
>>> Fixed range in safeload conditional to allow safeload to be used from
>>> 4 bytes.
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks for the patch. The reason why 4 bytes is excluded is that up to 4
>> bytes can be updated atomically with a single register write. But I could
>> see that if the firmware reads the same parameter multiple times during the
>> same run you could get inconsistent results.
>>
>> Can you explain a bit more why you need this?
>>
>> If we want to allow safeload for 4 byte parameters the same reasoning
>> applies for parameters with less than 4 bytes as well and so the check
>> should be removed completely.
>>
>> - Lars
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the feedback. It is correct that up to 4 bytes can be updated
> atomically but does that also guarantee that the data is safeloaded, i.e.
> updated when the parameter is not in use? Maybe updating up to 4 byte
> parameters without safeload does not cause audio glitches?
The datasheet says:
"""
To update parameters in real time while avoiding pop and click
noises on the output, the ADAU1761 uses a software safeload
mechanism. The software safeload mechanism enables the
SigmaDSP core to load new parameters into RAM while guaranteeing
that the parameters are not in use. This prevents an
undesirable condition where an instruction could execute with
a mix of old and new parameters.
"""
The way I understand the last sentence is that there is no issue when
loading only 4 bytes or less since there is no risk of mixing old and new data.
I don't mind changing this, I was just curious if you had seen any issues
with a 4 byte parameter update.
- Lars
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list