[alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: add missing compile rule for max98371
Takashi Iwai
tiwai at suse.de
Fri Sep 1 10:14:16 CEST 2017
On Fri, 01 Sep 2017 09:44:47 +0200,
Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
>
>
> Hi Takashi
>
> > > diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/Makefile b/sound/soc/codecs/Makefile
> > > index 12dc2f7..d93318e 100644
> > > --- a/sound/soc/codecs/Makefile
> > > +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/Makefile
> > > @@ -322,6 +322,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_MAX98088) += snd-soc-max98088.o
> > > obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_MAX98090) += snd-soc-max98090.o
> > > obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_MAX98095) += snd-soc-max98095.o
> > > obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_MAX98357A) += snd-soc-max98357a.o
> > > +obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_MAX98371) += snd-soc-max98371.o
> > > obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_MAX9867) += snd-soc-max9867.o
> > > obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_MAX98925) += snd-soc-max98925.o
> > > obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_MAX98926) += snd-soc-max98926.o
> >
> > This part doesn't match with the patch description.
> > You're trying to revive the dead driver build.
> > Ditto for sirf-audio-codec, too.
>
> Oops ?
> But, there is max98371.c on my tree? sirf too
> I'm using different branch ?
It's been there but never built. At least, your patch indicates
that.
Takashi
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list