[alsa-devel] [PATCH 3/8] ASoC: ACPI: add new fields for SOF support
Pierre-Louis Bossart
pierre-louis.bossart at linux.intel.com
Fri Oct 13 19:17:32 CEST 2017
On 10/13/17 11:35 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-10-12 at 18:49 -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>
>> - * @fw_filename: firmware file name.
>> + * @fw_filename: firmware file name. Used when SOF is not enabled.
>
>> + * @sof_fw_filename: Sound Open Firmware file name, if enabled
>> + * @sof_tplg_filename: Sound Open Firmware topology file name, if
>> enabled
>
> Naming looks a bit awkward to me, though I would like to bring something
> else here, i.e. unifying those firmwares somehow here.
>
> It might be dealt with using two different (embedded) structs, e.g.
>
> enum fw_type fw_type;
> union {
> struct regular_fw fw;
> struct sof_fw sof;
> }
>
> It looks for me slightly cleaner to this struct than bring everything
> inside it.
>
> What do you think?
It'll be up to users/distributions to select if they want the existing
drivers, or the SOF-based ones. I don't see how a union might accomplish
this - maybe I missed your point completely.
We wanted to store all the information required for both cases in one
structure tied to a specific HID. The fields for the existing solutions
were kept as is (except for the type renaming), and SOF stuff was added
as extensions.
>
>> + const char *sof_fw_filename;
>> + const char *sof_tplg_filename;
>> + const char *asoc_plat_name;
>> + struct platform_device * (*new_mach_data)(void *pdata);
>
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list