[alsa-devel] ALSA: nm256: Fine-tuning for three function implementations
SF Markus Elfring
elfring at users.sourceforge.net
Tue Nov 28 15:19:55 CET 2017
>> How would you notice that a corresponding system test worked
>> in reasonable ways?
>
> It needs a trust to the patch author or the tester who reported that
> it worked.
Can this aspect vary over time?
> The test result should be mentioned concisely.
How do you think about to introduce accepted automatic test procedures?
> You shouldn't rely on my system.
Did this system get sufficient trust so far?
> The main point is your patch itself; make your patch more reliable.
It seems that I can make my adjustments only a bit more interesting
by positive review comments from other contributors
(if you can not become convinced by the concrete source code changes).
Regards,
Markus
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list