[alsa-devel] [RFC PATCH 1/7] ASoC: Intel: Fix Kconfig
Pierre-Louis Bossart
pierre-louis.bossart at linux.intel.com
Tue Nov 21 22:31:03 CET 2017
On 11/21/17 11:07 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Nov 2017 01:01:56 +0100,
> Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>>
>> Follow network example suggested by Linus, move Intel definitions
>> in if/endif block and clarify which options distro configurations
>> should enable - everything except legacy Baytrail stuff and
>> NOCODEC (test only)
>>
>> There should be no functionality change - except that sound capabilities
>> are restored when using older configs without any user selection.
>>
>> Fixes: f6a118a800e3 ("ASoC: Intel: clarify Kconfig dependencies")
>> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds at linux-foundation.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart at linux.intel.com>
>
> A few another things I noticed while looking at the end result:
>
>> config SND_SOC_INTEL_SKYLAKE
>> tristate "Intel ASoC SST driver for SKL/BXT/KBL/GLK/CNL"
>> - depends on SND_SOC_INTEL_SST_TOPLEVEL && PCI && ACPI
>> + depends on PCI && ACPI
>> select SND_HDA_EXT_CORE
>> select SND_HDA_DSP_LOADER
>> select SND_SOC_TOPOLOGY
>> select SND_SOC_INTEL_SST
>> + select SND_SOC_INTEL_COMMON
>> +
>> +endif ## SND_SOC_INTEL_SST_TOPLEVEL
>
> This endif should cover the whole including the source
> boards/Kconfig. In that way, deselecting SND_SOC_INTEL_SST_TOPLEVEL
> will skip the whole. As of this patch, you'll be still asked about
> the board config even if you say TOPLEVEL=n.
yes for now, but it's a feature needed for SOF integration...see below.
>
>> # ASoC codec drivers
>> source "sound/soc/intel/boards/Kconfig"
>> +
>> +# configs common to SST and SOF to compile sound/soc/intel/common
>> +# directory and use matching tables
>> +
>> +config SND_SOC_INTEL_COMMON
>> + tristate
>> + select SND_SOC_ACPI_INTEL_MATCH if ACPI
>> +
>> +config SND_SOC_ACPI_INTEL_MATCH
>> + tristate
>> + select SND_SOC_ACPI if ACPI
>
> ... so here should be placed the endif.
Those two are needed for SOF and shouldn't be filtered out by SST. we
can move them somewhere else if needed.
>
>> diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/boards/Kconfig b/sound/soc/intel/boards/Kconfig
>> index 6f754708a48c..4ae44b0cea0a 100644
>> --- a/sound/soc/intel/boards/Kconfig
>> +++ b/sound/soc/intel/boards/Kconfig
>> @@ -1,7 +1,14 @@
>> -config SND_SOC_INTEL_MACH
>> - tristate "Intel Audio machine drivers"
>> - depends on SND_SOC_INTEL_SST_TOPLEVEL
>> - select SND_SOC_ACPI_INTEL_MATCH if ACPI
>> +config SND_SOC_INTEL_MACH
>> + bool "Intel ASoC machine drivers"
>> + default y
>> + help
>> + Intel ASoC Audio Machine Drivers. If you have a Intel machine that
>> + has audio controller with a DSP and I2S or DMIC port, then
>> + enable this option by saying Y
>> +
>> + Note that the answer to this question doesn't directly affect the
>> + kernel: saying N will just cause the configurator to skip all
>> + the questions about Intel SST machine drivers.
>
> Do we still need this filtering? Since we have a top-level filter,
> users who want to skip the Intel stuff can say N there already, and I
> can't imagine anyone who want only the SST core / platform drivers
> built without machine drivers explicitly.
Yes, but when we add SOF we will have an alternate top-level and the
machine drivers should be selectable even when SST is filtered out.
>
>
> thanks,
>
> Takashi
>
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list