[alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: da7218: Fix incorrect usage of bitwise '&' operator for SRM check
Adam Thomson
Adam.Thomson.Opensource at diasemi.com
Wed May 3 16:19:51 CEST 2017
On 03 May 2017 15:10, Takashi Sakamoto wrote:
> On May 3 2017 22:54, Adam Thomson wrote:
> > In the SRM lock check section of code the '&' bitwise operator is
> > used as part of checking lock status. Functionally the code works
> > as intended, but the conditional statement is a boolean comparison
> > so should really use '&&' logical operator instead. This commit
> > rectifies this discrepancy.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource at diasemi.com>
> > ---
> > sound/soc/codecs/da7218.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Reviewed-by: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi at sakamocchi.jp>
Thanks :)
> > diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/da7218.c b/sound/soc/codecs/da7218.c
> > index d256ebf..6e1940e 100644
> > --- a/sound/soc/codecs/da7218.c
> > +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/da7218.c
> > @@ -1457,7 +1457,7 @@ static int da7218_dai_event(struct
> snd_soc_dapm_widget *w,
> > ++i;
> > msleep(DA7218_SRM_CHECK_DELAY);
> > }
> > - } while ((i < DA7218_SRM_CHECK_TRIES) & (!success));
> > + } while ((i < DA7218_SRM_CHECK_TRIES) && (!success));
> >
> > if (!success)
> > dev_warn(codec->dev, "SRM failed to lock\n");
>
> Would you please fix codes for da7213, too?
Thought you may be re-spinning your patch, but that's fine. I'll send an update
for da7213 as well.
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list