[alsa-devel] [PATCH] ALSA: hda - Add Coffelake PCI ID

[Takashi Iwai]

On Wed, 14 Jun 2017 07:41:10 +0200,
Takashi Iwai wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 14 Jun 2017 07:25:17 +0200,
> Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > 
> > But while writing this, I noticed that Broxton-T seems forgotten.
> > Doesn't it need the similar workaround for SKL+ chips?
> 
> I meant like below.

Can anyone confirm whether it is required or not?

There are two things applied specific to BXT: one is the generic SKL+
quirk and another is a quick to reduce DMA latency.  Maybe the latter
one is superfluous for BXT-T but only the former one is needed?


thanks,

Takashi

> 
> Takashi
> 
> -- 8< --
> From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai at suse.de>
> Subject: [PATCH] ALSA: hda - Apply quirks to Broxton-T, too
> 
> Broxton-T was a forgotten child and we didn't apply the quirks
> properly.  Let's fix it.
> 
> Cc: <stable at vger.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai at suse.de>
> ---
>  sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c b/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c
> index e3c696c46a21..774f72b26d13 100644
> --- a/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c
> +++ b/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c
> @@ -369,7 +369,8 @@ enum {
>  #define IS_KBL(pci) ((pci)->vendor == 0x8086 && (pci)->device == 0xa171)
>  #define IS_KBL_LP(pci) ((pci)->vendor == 0x8086 && (pci)->device == 0x9d71)
>  #define IS_KBL_H(pci) ((pci)->vendor == 0x8086 && (pci)->device == 0xa2f0)
> -#define IS_BXT(pci) ((pci)->vendor == 0x8086 && (pci)->device == 0x5a98)
> +#define IS_BXT(pci) ((pci)->vendor == 0x8086 && \
> +		     ((pci)->device == 0x5a98 || (pci)->device == 0x1a98))
>  #define IS_GLK(pci) ((pci)->vendor == 0x8086 && (pci)->device == 0x3198)
>  #define IS_CFL(pci) ((pci)->vendor == 0x8086 && (pci)->device == 0xa348)
>  #define IS_SKL_PLUS(pci) (IS_SKL(pci) || IS_SKL_LP(pci) || IS_BXT(pci)) || \
> -- 
> 2.13.1
>