[alsa-devel] [PATCH v7 0/5] Add platform clock for BayTrail platforms

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 2:00 AM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd at codeaurora.org> wrote:
> On 01/18, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Tue, 2017-01-17 at 15:57 -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>> > These patches specifically enable the audio MCLK required by Baytrail
>> > CR devices. It is the remaining part of a bigger set of patches
>> > (already merged in Mark Brown's tree) that enable sound for Baytrail
>> > CR
>> > devices (especially Asus T100TAF) [1]. They include the clock driver
>> > and clock enabling in the pmc_atom code (along with moving of the
>> > non-architectural pmc_atom driver code into drivers/platform/x86 as
>> > suggested by Thomas Gleixner [2]). This move includes a new header in
>> > include/linux/platform_data/x86/. While there is an agreement that the
>> > definitions for PMC clocks are not really platform data this location
>> > is seen as a good-enough compromise with an agreement between Darren
>> > Hart and Andy Shevchenko [3]
>> >
>> > [1] http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2016-August/1
>> > 11704.html
>> > [2] http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2016-October/
>> > 113936.html
>> > [3] http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2016-December
>> > /115892.html
>> >
>>
>> Stephen, I see no issues with the patches. If you want to push them
>> through your tree, take a tag from PDx86 subsystem point of view:
>
> Does PDx86 == platform device x86?

Yes.

> I can provide a stable branch
> in clk tree for platform tree, or platform x86 maintainer can ack
> the platform/x86 patches and I can take the whole batch through
> clk tree.

That's what I did. Do you need Darren's one?

>>
>> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com>

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko