[alsa-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] ASoC: core: Add API to use DMI name in sound card long name

[Liam Girdwood]

On Wed, 2017-01-04 at 15:03 +0800, Mengdong Lin wrote:
> 
> On 01/04/2017 04:09 AM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> >
> >>>> I dont think we need vendor (it just makes it too long). The product
> >>>> or board
> >>>> name should be unique enough for us to load the correct files.
> >>>>
> >>>> Liam
> >>> Yes, from the sample machines I checked, product or board name are
> >>> unique. But I feel there might be the risk that two vendors happen to
> >>> use the same product or board name, e.g. "T100TA".
> >> I think this would be problematic from a legal/marketing position from
> >> two different vendors so it would be unlikely.
> >
> > Please don't remove the manufacturer name for now...
> > Some vendors use product names that are indeed unique and easy enough to
> > remember, but others like Lenovo use "1952W5R" or "20C3001VHH" (real
> > examples you can Google to see I am not making this up). The board name
> > can also be "SKG18 t". I really have no appetite for a UCM directory
> > called 20C3001VHH.SKG18t :-)
> > I would also be ready to bet that smaller manufacturers in the Chinese
> > ecosystem use similar product names at the DMI level. removing the
> > vendor name would likely result in mistakes.
> > You really want the manufacturer name to make the maintenance of these
> > files easier on the rest of us. Sometimes the DMI version field is
> > actually more self-explanatory, e.g. "ThinkPad 60" or "ThinkPad 10" for
> > the two Lenovo examples, maybe this is something we ought to look at.
> >
> >
> 
> So we'll keep the manufacturer name.
> 
> And let's put the "Product version" as well if available, Liam?

Yes, lets keep the manufacturer name. I agree with Pierre in that we
dont want meaningless directories names. Creating a directory structures
like  

1) manufacturer/product/board OR
2) manufacturer/product OR
3) manufacturer/board

(2 or 3 if board or product is NULL)

are fine by me and make finding the correct card simpler. You could even
replace the . with / in your longname to save the string conversion
later on.

Liam 
> 
> I also observed Lenovo puts the the user-friendly name in the product 
> version like "Thinkpad S5 Yoga 15", while it product name is 
> "20DQA00KCD", no self-explanatory.
> 
> It seems different manufacturer tend to put self-explanatory name in 
> different fields:
> Lenovo thinkpad: product version
> Dell: product name
> ASUS: both product name and board name
> Intel: board name
> 
> Do we want some table to specify the field we want for major vendors? So 
> we may just pick the most valuable DMI field for the card long name, for 
> those manufacturers to save the space. But it may not scale if the 
> manufacturer change their preference or use different way for different 
> product series, since I only checked a few machines by a few vendors.
> 
> Also I wonder if we find the key word like "Dell, HP or ASUS", may we 
> not use verbatim copy on the vendor name but just use these key words? 
> This can also save some space.
> 
> Thanks
> Mengdong
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Alsa-devel mailing list
> > Alsa-devel at alsa-project.org
> > http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Alsa-devel mailing list
> Alsa-devel at alsa-project.org
> http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel