[alsa-devel] [PATCH v5 1/6] ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Add ssp clock driver
Subhransu S. Prusty
subhransu.s.prusty at intel.com
Mon Dec 18 06:01:14 CET 2017
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 09:27:16AM +0530, Subhransu S. Prusty wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 02:30:32PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > On 12/11, Sriram Periyasamy wrote:
> > > +
> > > +static int skl_clk_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> > > + unsigned long parent_rate)
> > > +{
> > > + struct skl_clk *clkdev = to_skl_clk(hw);
> > > + struct skl_clk_rate_cfg_table *rcfg;
> > > + int clk_type;
> > > +
> > > + if (!clkdev)
> > > + return -ENODEV;
> >
> > These checks don't make sense. container_of() on clk_hw
> > structures returning NULL wouldn't happen.
>
> Sure. will remove.
>
> >
> > > +
> > > + if (!rate)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > + if (__clk_is_enabled(hw->clk) && (clkdev->rate != rate))
> >
> > Any chance you can directly read the hardware instead of going
> > through the framework to find out if the clk is enabled? Seems
>
> No. This involves sending an IPC to DSP to enable clock and interpreting the
> return error code. I would like to avoid doing this here in set_rate.
>
> > circular to do it this way.
> >
> > > + return -EBUSY;
> > > +
> > > + rcfg = skl_get_rate_cfg(clkdev->pdata->ssp_clks[clkdev->id].rate_cfg,
> > > + rate);
> > > + if (!rcfg)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > + clk_type = skl_get_clk_type(clkdev->id);
> > > + if (clk_type < 0)
> > > + return clk_type;
> > > +
> > > + skl_fill_clk_ipc(rcfg, clk_type);
> > > + clkdev->rate = rate;
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static unsigned long skl_clk_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> > > + unsigned long parent_rate)
> > > +{
> > > + struct skl_clk *clkdev = to_skl_clk(hw);
> > > + struct skl_clk_rate_cfg_table *rcfg;
> > > + int clk_type;
> > > +
> > > + if (!clkdev)
> > > + return 0;
> > > +
> > > + if (clkdev->rate)
> > > + return clkdev->rate;
> >
> > Why is the rate being cached? We should always be able to
> > calculate the rate based on parent_rate that gets passed to this
> > function?
>
> Will check and get back.
If I understand correctly, you refer to deriving the rate from parent_rate
using ratios. But since only the DSP is aware of the ratios and not the
driver, the driver can't derive the rate from the parent_rate and thus
cached.
>
> Regards,
> Subhransu
>
> >
> > > +
> > > + rcfg = skl_get_rate_cfg(clkdev->pdata->ssp_clks[clkdev->id].rate_cfg,
> > > + parent_rate);
> > > + if (!rcfg)
> > > + return 0;
> > > +
> > > + clk_type = skl_get_clk_type(clkdev->id);
> > > + if (clk_type < 0)
> > > + return 0;
> > > +
> > > + skl_fill_clk_ipc(rcfg, clk_type);
> > > + clkdev->rate = rcfg->rate;
> > > +
> > > + return clkdev->rate;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/* Not supported by clk driver. Implemented to satisfy clk fw */
> > > +long skl_clk_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> > > + unsigned long *parent_rate)
> > > +{
> > > + return rate;
> > > +}
> >
> > --
> > Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
> > a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>
> --
--
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list