[alsa-devel] [RFC v3 06/11] ASoC: hdac_hda: add ASoC based HDA codec driver
Takashi Iwai
tiwai at suse.de
Sat Dec 16 10:13:36 CET 2017
On Sat, 16 Dec 2017 08:48:35 +0100,
Ughreja, Rakesh A wrote:
>
>
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Takashi Iwai [mailto:tiwai at suse.de]
> >Sent: Friday, December 15, 2017 9:18 PM
> >To: Ughreja, Rakesh A <rakesh.a.ughreja at intel.com>
> >Cc: alsa-devel at alsa-project.org; broonie at kernel.org;
> >liam.r.girdwood at linux.intel.com; pierre-louis.bossart at linux.intel.com; Koul, Vinod
> ><vinod.koul at intel.com>; Patches Audio <patches.audio at intel.com>
> >Subject: Re: [RFC v3 06/11] ASoC: hdac_hda: add ASoC based HDA codec driver
> >
>
> >> >Can we check differently? For example, we may put some difference in
> >> >the driver and check it here instead of the static IS_ENABLED().
> >>
> >> Do you think a module parameter is a good idea ?
> >
> >I don't think so. We do need to consider a better way.
> >
> >Maybe an alternative is to give the additional indirect calls.
> >That is, put some new ops or hook to the bus for calling some extra
> >probing task in addition to the standard codec probe.
> >
>
> I am not sure if I understand you fully, so asking some follow up
> Questions.
>
> I am assuming you are asking me to implement something like following.
> Where I have to implement snd_hda_get_mode() function which would
> return "true" if we need to register the driver as "asoc" driver.
>
> Is that right understanding ?
>
> int __hda_codec_driver_register(struct hda_codec_driver *drv, const char *name,
> struct module *owner)
> {
> /*
> * check if we need to register ASoC HDA driver
> */
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SND_SOC_HDAC_HDA)
> int asoc_mode = snd_hda_get_mode();
> if (asoc_mode) {
> drv->core.id_table = drv->id;
> return __hdac_hda_codec_driver_register(&drv->core, name, owner);
> }
> #endif
> return __hda_legacy_codec_driver_register(drv, name, owner);
> }
>
> If above is true then the follow up question is, what are the criteria to determine
> the mode. Since I cannot assume that the bus instance is already created at the
> time of driver registration, I am not sure how to determine what kind of platform
> driver would be loaded in future.
My assumption is that there is only one hda_codec_driver_register().
The legacy code needs to be rewritten to implement the standard
probe/remove as preliminary. Any the rest differentiation is done via
additional callbacks at probe/remove time.
Takashi
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list