[alsa-devel] snd_soc_set_dmi_name - Shouldn't it use SYS_VENDOR?

[Daniel Drake]

On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Pierre-Louis Bossart
<pierre-louis.bossart at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Not sure if we can really limit the conventions to type1 or type2 if we want
> the names to be somewhat meaningful.
>
> I can't recall why we selected DMI_BOARD_VENDOR instead of DMI_SYS_VENDOR
> though.

Is it too late to change to DMI_SYS_VENDOR? Or to have both present in
the string?

Thanks
Daniel