[alsa-devel] PM issue with Intel SST Atom driver

[Vinod Koul]

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 08:32:14PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 18:27:38 +0200,
> > 
> > So we should add the remaining one byt-max98090.c as Takashi fixed
> > byt-rt5640.c one. I will send the patch for this one.
> 
> Or maybe we should replace these definitions with some macro to expand
> to the mostly same contents?  The difference is just a few callback
> functions, basically.

And while at it, I cant help but wonder but if we can do better and mark it
in platform driver thus avoiding it replication in machines. Afterall the
atomic trigger is a platform property.

Thanks
-- 
~Vinod