[alsa-devel] [PATCH 3/3] sound: ASoC: tegra: Select tegra30 i2s and ahub for tegra124 SoC

[Paul Kocialkowski]

Le mardi 18 avril 2017 à 10:15 -0600, Stephen Warren a écrit :
> On 04/18/2017 09:11 AM, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> > This selects the tegra30 i2s and ahub controllers for the tegra124 SoC.
> > These are needed when building without ARCH_TEGRA_3x_SOC set.
> > diff --git a/sound/soc/tegra/Kconfig b/sound/soc/tegra/Kconfig
> > index efbe8d4c019e..bcd18d2cf7a7 100644
> > --- a/sound/soc/tegra/Kconfig
> > +++ b/sound/soc/tegra/Kconfig
> > @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ config SND_SOC_TEGRA20_SPDIF
> > 
> >  config SND_SOC_TEGRA30_AHUB
> >  	tristate
> > -	depends on SND_SOC_TEGRA && ARCH_TEGRA_3x_SOC
> > +	depends on SND_SOC_TEGRA && (ARCH_TEGRA_3x_SOC ||
> > ARCH_TEGRA_124_SOC)
> 
> Is this really a compile-time dependency?

From a quick look at the code, I doubt this is really a build dependency.

> If so, don't we need to add T210 and T186 entries into that || condition too,
> since we could be building a kernel with just T210/T186 support and no T124
> support?

In the spirit of this patch, adding entries for other tegra platforms would make
sense. Would you prefer that we leave out the dependency from SND_SOC_TEGRA30_*
and only select the right I2S driver to use in each codec driver?

If not, we'd have to list all relevant platforms both in the I2S/AHUB drivers
and in each codec's rules (which is not necessarily and issue, but there's no
need to have artificial platform dependencies).

What do you think?

-- 
Paul Kocialkowski, developer of free digital technology at the lower levels

Website: https://www.paulk.fr/
Coding blog: https://code.paulk.fr/
Git repositories: https://git.paulk.fr/ https://git.code.paulk.fr/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/attachments/20170418/ad0f169d/attachment-0001.sig>