[alsa-devel] Bad rever-select of CONFIG_SND_HDA_I915

Takashi Iwai tiwai at suse.de
Fri Mar 18 10:22:45 CET 2016


On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 09:06:49 +0100,
Vinod Koul wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 08:34:49AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > while build testing, I noticed the following warning:
> >   warning: (SND_SOC_INTEL_SKYLAKE) selects SND_HDA_I915 which has unmet direct dependencies (SOUND && !M68K && !UML && SND && DRM_I915 && SND_HDA_CORE)
> 
> Thanks Takashi for reporting,
> 
> > And it's indeed broken: you can't select CONFIG_SND_HDA_I915 from the
> > driver side.  This is the condition depending on DRM i915 driver.
> 
> But who selects CONFIG_SND_HDA_I915. It is a bool symbol, so someone needs
> to select it. I didn't see anyone select it, either from Gfx side or HDA
> side?

No, it's not a kconfig to be selected manually by others, but it
adjusts itself automatically depending on DRM_I915.  That is, it's a
read-only value.

> > Fixing this doesn't look too trivial, though.  Since
> > SND_SOC_INTEL_SKYLAKE is the item to be selected, it can't have
> > "depends on".  So, the top-level configs that select
> > SND_SOC_INTEL_SKYLAKE need to have "depends on DRM_I915" lines, or
> > modify the driver to be built without i915 binding.
> 
> can you please share the config where you saw this...

Just set DRM_I915=n and run config again on your machine.


Takashi


More information about the Alsa-devel mailing list