[alsa-devel] [PATCH 3/5] ALSA: soc-sst-bxt-da7219_max98357a: fix obsoleted initializers for array
Takashi Sakamoto
o-takashi at sakamocchi.jp
Wed Jul 27 05:38:35 CEST 2016
Hi Vinod,
On Jul 27 2016 12:15, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:41:55PM +0900, Takashi Sakamoto wrote:
>> Sparse reports below warnings.
>>
>> bxt_da7219_max98357a.c:250:9: warning: obsolete array initializer, use C99 syntax
>> bxt_da7219_max98357a.c:275:9: warning: obsolete array initializer, use C99 syntax
>> bxt_da7219_max98357a.c:290:9: warning: obsolete array initializer, use C99 syntax
>> bxt_da7219_max98357a.c:304:9: warning: obsolete array initializer, use C99 syntax
>> bxt_da7219_max98357a.c:317:9: warning: obsolete array initializer, use C99 syntax
>>
>> There's no need to use obsoleted way. This commit fixes it.
>
> Thanks for the patch
>
> Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul at intel.com>
Thanks for your review.
On Jul 26 2016 22:41, Takashi Sakamoto wrote:
> Although I got many warnings from Intel SST drivers due to confusions
> of address spaces (__iomem and __kernel), I still left them as they
> are, because they require more codes to fix. I hope Intel developers
> will do additional work for them...
For your information. I'm happy if you and Intel developers are somewhat
aware of them.
$ cd sound/soc/intel
atom/sst/sst_drv_interface.c:280:19: warning: cast removes address space
of expression
atom/sst/sst_drv_interface.c:281:17: warning: incorrect type in argument
2 (different address spaces)
atom/sst/sst_drv_interface.c:281:17: expected void const volatile
[noderef] <asn:2>*src
atom/sst/sst_drv_interface.c:281:17: got void *
atom/sst/sst_drv_interface.c:288:19: warning: cast removes address space
of expression
atom/sst/sst_drv_interface.c:288:14: warning: incorrect type in
assignment (different address spaces)
atom/sst/sst_drv_interface.c:288:14: expected void [noderef] <asn:2>*addr
atom/sst/sst_drv_interface.c:288:14: got void *
atom/sst/sst_drv_interface.c:375:19: warning: cast removes address space
of expression
atom/sst/sst_drv_interface.c:376:17: warning: incorrect type in argument
2 (different address spaces)
atom/sst/sst_drv_interface.c:376:17: expected void const volatile
[noderef] <asn:2>*src
atom/sst/sst_drv_interface.c:376:17: got void *
atom/sst/sst_drv_interface.c:563:19: warning: cast removes address space
of expression
atom/sst/sst_drv_interface.c:564:25: warning: incorrect type in argument
2 (different address spaces)
atom/sst/sst_drv_interface.c:564:25: expected void const volatile
[noderef] <asn:2>*src
atom/sst/sst_drv_interface.c:564:25: got void *
atom/sst/sst_loader.c:55:26: warning: incorrect type in argument 1
(different address spaces)
atom/sst/sst_loader.c:55:26: expected void [noderef] <asn:2>*to
atom/sst/sst_loader.c:55:26: got void *dst
atom/sst/sst_loader.c:55:31: warning: incorrect type in argument 2
(different address spaces)
atom/sst/sst_loader.c:55:31: expected void const *from
atom/sst/sst_loader.c:55:31: got void const [noderef] <asn:2>*src
atom/sst/sst_loader.c:220:43: warning: incorrect type in argument 2
(different address spaces)
atom/sst/sst_loader.c:220:43: expected void *destn
atom/sst/sst_loader.c:220:43: got void [noderef] <asn:2>*
common/sst-firmware.c:272:5: warning: symbol 'sst_dma_new' was not
declared. Should it be static?
common/sst-firmware.c:326:6: warning: symbol 'sst_dma_free' was not
declared. Should it be static?
common/sst-firmware.c:973:37: warning: incorrect type in argument 1
(different address spaces)
common/sst-firmware.c:973:37: expected void [noderef] <asn:2>*dest
common/sst-firmware.c:973:37: got void *buffer
common/sst-firmware.c:973:61: warning: incorrect type in argument 2
(different address spaces)
common/sst-firmware.c:973:61: expected void *src
common/sst-firmware.c:973:61: got void [noderef] <asn:2>*
Regards
Takashi Sakamoto
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list