[alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: Extend FLL function
John Hsu
KCHSU0 at nuvoton.com
Mon Jan 4 11:04:12 CET 2016
Dear all,
Please check up in the following comment, and I cut off original mail.
On 12/31/2015 5:14 PM, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
>> /* freq_out must be 256*Fs in order to achieve the best performance */
>> @@ -970,6 +981,37 @@ static int nau8825_set_pll(struct snd_soc_codec *codec, int pll_id, int source,
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +static int nau8825_mclk_prepare(struct nau8825 *nau8825, unsigned int freq)
>> +{
>> + int ret = 0;
>> +
>> + /* We selected MCLK source but the clock itself managed externally */
>> + if (!nau8825->mclk)
>> + goto done;
>>
>
> A nitpick.
>
> This "goto" style is used for recovering resources or something that
> should be restored in case of error. But in your case "done:" does not
> recover anything. It is cleaner remove "goto" and replace with "return
> 0" or "return err".
>
>
OK, I'll change it.
>> +
>> + if (!nau8825->mclk_freq) {
>> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(nau8825->mclk);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(nau8825->dev, "Unable to prepare codec mclk\n");
>> + goto done;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (nau8825->mclk_freq != freq) {
>> + nau8825->mclk_freq = freq;
>> +
>> + freq = clk_round_rate(nau8825->mclk, freq);
>> + ret = clk_set_rate(nau8825->mclk, freq);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(nau8825->dev, "Unable to set mclk rate\n");
>> + goto done;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> +done:
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>>
>> break;
>> case NAU8825_CLK_INTERNAL:
>> @@ -1018,6 +1040,30 @@ static int nau8825_configure_sysclk(struct nau8825 *nau8825, int clk_id,
>> }
>>
>> break;
>> + case NAU8825_CLK_FLL_MCLK:
>> + regmap_update_bits(regmap, NAU8825_REG_FLL3,
>> + NAU8825_FLL_CLK_SRC_MASK, NAU8825_FLL_CLK_SRC_MCLK);
>> + ret = nau8825_mclk_prepare(nau8825, freq);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + break;
>> + case NAU8825_CLK_FLL_BLK:
>> + regmap_update_bits(regmap, NAU8825_REG_FLL3,
>> + NAU8825_FLL_CLK_SRC_MASK, NAU8825_FLL_CLK_SRC_BLK);
>> + ret = nau8825_mclk_prepare(nau8825, freq);
>>
>
>
> Based on names for these constants I believe CODEC is going to use
> BCLK/FS signal of I2S bus as a clock signal reference.
>
> Do you still need MCLK signal in this case? If no then you should
> disable MCLK to save some power.
>
>
Yes, the MCLK should disable when FLL reference to BCLK/FS for power saving.
I'll disable it like internal clock case.
BR.
John
More information about the Alsa-devel
mailing list